logo

Accounting for genocide: legal and scientific accounting practices in the wake of the Srebrenica genocide

One of 10,000+ projects Taiyo tracks in Germany.

Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal

Project
Ended

“Accounting for genocide” empirically considers two sociomaterial practices of accounting for the 1995 Srebrenica genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina. First, it scrutinizes efforts of national and international organizations to (ac)count how many Bosniak men were massacred and who was killed in July 1995. The second question about accounting analyses how those politically responsible at the time of

Status
Closed
Sector
Government
Location
Germany
Updated
22 Jul 2026
Source
EU Funding & Tenders Portal

ConstructChat

Ask ConstructChat about Accounting for genocide: legal and scientific accounting practices in the wake of the Srebrenica genocide

Pick a question to edit it, or write your own.

First answer free · no account

I am a

Project Information FAQ

Project Information

4 Q
The project “Accounting for genocide: legal and scientific accounting practices in the wake of the Srebrenica genocide” is an infrastructure initiative in the Government sector, located in Germany. Taiyo aggregates data on it from EU Funding & Tenders Portal.

Participants

Sponsoring Agency

Status

Original status

ended

Taiyo status

Closed

Taiyo last update

2026-07-22

Contact

Not available for this record.

Description

Description

“Accounting for genocide” empirically considers two sociomaterial practices of accounting for the 1995 Srebrenica genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina. First, it scrutinizes efforts of national and international organizations to (ac)count how many Bosniak men were massacred and who was killed in July 1995. The second question about accounting analyses how those politically responsible at the time of the genocide are legally tried at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The first practice of accounting is based on inter alia forensic science, statistics, missing persons lists and witnesses conveniently subsumed under ‘atrocity victim identification’ (AVI), the second practice is the domain of adversarial legal proceedings, developing international criminal law, transitional justice and controversies over the Srebrenica genocide and legitimacy of the ICTY. A rigorous qualitative analysis focusing on the various locations—mass-graves, family assistance centres, forensic laboratories, the ICTY, public domain—where objects like remains, missing persons, identities, crimes, DNA evidence, and legal cases come to matter provides a deep understanding of the question of how both practices of accounting become entangled and co-construct each other.

Location

Country

Germany

Source

Source

EU Funding & Tenders Portal

URL

More Details

Record type

Project

Sector

Government

Article published date

2026-01-01

More on this project

Research

Free account

View all details

You are reading the public part. A free account opens the rest:

  • Every detail on this project
  • News and media coverage
  • Technical research
View all details

Free account · no card · lands you back on this project