Accounting for genocide: legal and scientific accounting practices in the wake of the Srebrenica genocide
One of 10,000+ projects Taiyo tracks in Germany.
Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal
“Accounting for genocide” empirically considers two sociomaterial practices of accounting for the 1995 Srebrenica genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina. First, it scrutinizes efforts of national and international organizations to (ac)count how many Bosniak men were massacred and who was killed in July 1995. The second question about accounting analyses how those politically responsible at the time of
- Status
- Closed
- Sector
- Government
- Location
- Germany
- Updated
- 22 Jul 2026
- Source
- EU Funding & Tenders Portal
ConstructChat
Ask ConstructChat about Accounting for genocide: legal and scientific accounting practices in the wake of the Srebrenica genocide
Pick a question to edit it, or write your own.
First answer free · no account
Project Information FAQ
Project Information
Participants
Sponsoring Agency |
Status
Original status | ended |
Taiyo status | Closed |
Taiyo last update | 2026-07-22 |
Contact
| Not available for this record. |
Description
Description | “Accounting for genocide” empirically considers two sociomaterial practices of accounting for the 1995 Srebrenica genocide in Bosnia and Herzegovina. First, it scrutinizes efforts of national and international organizations to (ac)count how many Bosniak men were massacred and who was killed in July 1995. The second question about accounting analyses how those politically responsible at the time of the genocide are legally tried at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The first practice of accounting is based on inter alia forensic science, statistics, missing persons lists and witnesses conveniently subsumed under ‘atrocity victim identification’ (AVI), the second practice is the domain of adversarial legal proceedings, developing international criminal law, transitional justice and controversies over the Srebrenica genocide and legitimacy of the ICTY. A rigorous qualitative analysis focusing on the various locations—mass-graves, family assistance centres, forensic laboratories, the ICTY, public domain—where objects like remains, missing persons, identities, crimes, DNA evidence, and legal cases come to matter provides a deep understanding of the question of how both practices of accounting become entangled and co-construct each other. |
Location
Country | Germany |
Source
Source | EU Funding & Tenders Portal |
URL |
More Details
Record type | Project |
Sector | Government |
Article published date | 2026-01-01 |
Research
Free account
View all details
You are reading the public part. A free account opens the rest:
- Every detail on this project
- News and media coverage
- Technical research
Free account · no card · lands you back on this project
