Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit, Rocky Mountain CESU
Sector: Education • Location: United States of America
Source: Grants.gov
The purpose of this CESU will be to determine the value and societal benefits that are derived from the Mid Level resolution Imagery (MLRI) program through identification and classification of users, a better understanding of the uses and applications. In addition it will estimate the societal benefit or MLRI for decision makers. Develop a set of questions for valuing the use of MLRI in decision
Project Information FAQ
Project Information
Want to explore the full details? View the full report
Participants
Sponsoring Agency | Obfuscated Data |
Company | Obfuscated Data |
Status
Original status | archived |
Taiyo status | Obfuscated Data |
Taiyo last update | 00-00-0000 |
Available timestamps | 00-00-0000 |
Available timestamp type | Obfuscated Data |
Contact
Contact name | Obfuscated Data |
Phone | 0000000000 |
ObfuscatedData@email.com | |
Address | Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data |
Description
Description | The purpose of this CESU will be to determine the value and societal benefits that are derived from the Mid Level resolution Imagery (MLRI) program through identification and classification of users, a better understanding of the uses and applications. In addition it will estimate the societal benefit or MLRI for decision makers. Develop a set of questions for valuing the use of MLRI in decision making. Topics to be covered in this section of the survey will include the following: Perceived benefits of satellite imagery How important is the imagery to activities How likely is it that operational use of x application would happen if MLRI werent available, including: o Lost revenues (product relies heavily on Landsat)o Impairs decision-making capacity leading to greater uncertainty in outcomeso Increased labor / time to do the same operational application of the imageryo Increased costs from substitution of higher cost imagery What are the substitutes for MLRI how would users get by without access to the imagery? Non-market/market valuation efficiency, cost, productivity, etc?University economists will work with USGS economists in developing the appropriate valuation questions for the various moderate-resolution imagery users. University economists will work with USGS during the summer of 2008 to develop an initial set of questions for peer review and OMB approval. USGS is responsible for pre-testing and obtaining OMB approval of the final questionnaire. University economists will work with USGS in fall 2008 through summer 2009 to address any peer review and OMB comments or concerns regarding the valuation questions in the pre-test and final survey. |
Original sub-sector | Obfuscated |
Original Currency | USD |
Original budget | 000000000000000 |
Procurement method | Obfuscated Data |
Budget | 000000000000000 |
Location
Region | Obfuscated |
Country | Obfuscated |
State | Obfuscated Data |
County | Obfuscated |
Location | Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data |
Source
Source reliability | High |
Data quality score | 100% |
Source | Obfuscated Data |
URL | obfuscated_data,obfuscateddata.com |
More Details
Project Type | Obfuscated Data |
Article Published Date | Obfuscated Data |
