Mutual recognition in Europe Through Intervision Studies
Sector: Cement • Location: France, Belgium, Netherlands, Spain
Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal
"Framework Decisions 2005/214/JHA, 2008/909/JHA and 2008/947/JHA have created tools for mutual recognition of penalties involving financial penalties, custodial sentences and probation or alternative sanctions. However, despite their value, these procedures are currently underused. The METIS project (Mutual recognition in Europe Through Intervision Studies) proposes, by bringing together a consort
Project Information FAQ
Project Information
Want to explore the full details? View the full report
Participants
Sponsoring Agency | Obfuscated Data |
Company | Obfuscated Data |
Status
Original status | ended |
Taiyo status | Obfuscated Data |
Taiyo last update | 00-00-0000 |
Available timestamps | 00-00-0000 |
Available timestamp type | Obfuscated Data |
Contact
Contact name | Obfuscated Data |
Phone | 0000000000 |
ObfuscatedData@email.com | |
Address | Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data |
Description
Description | "Framework Decisions 2005/214/JHA, 2008/909/JHA and 2008/947/JHA have created tools for mutual recognition of penalties involving financial penalties, custodial sentences and probation or alternative sanctions. However, despite their value, these procedures are currently underused. The METIS project (Mutual recognition in Europe Through Intervision Studies) proposes, by bringing together a consortium of Member States (France, Belgium, Spain and the Netherlands), to work for a better understanding of the difficulties and the development of concrete tools to enable practitioners to implement those three framework Decisions. The objectives of the project will be as follows: - First, make a ""theoretical"" inventory of the specificities of each consortium member state in the implementation of the three project framework decisions and agree on a common framework for the project; - Secondly, in a much more operational way, identify common difficulties and good practices, define areas for improvement in the implementation of the project's framework decisions and draw up a European guide dedicated to their implementation; - Thirdly, publicly present the results of the project and the European guide; - Finally, ensure the widest possible dissemination of the project's results to the competent authorities (central or local) but also to convicted persons " |
Original sub-sector | Obfuscated |
Original Currency | USD |
Original budget | 000000000000000 |
Procurement method | Obfuscated Data |
Budget | 000000000000000 |
Location
Region | Obfuscated |
Country | Obfuscated |
State | Obfuscated Data |
County | Obfuscated |
Location | Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data |
Source
Source reliability | High |
Data quality score | 100% |
Source | Obfuscated Data |
URL | obfuscated_data,obfuscateddata.com |
More Details
Project Type | Obfuscated Data |
Article Published Date | Obfuscated Data |
