Non-Utilitarian Perspectives on Population Policy
Sector: Government • Location: Switzerland
Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal
The world is undergoing a dramatic demographic transition. Fertility rates are falling almost everywhere. In many countries, birth rates are already below replacement. How should policymakers respond, if at all? This question poses a unique challenge because, in addition to standard utilitarian considerations, there are important non-utilitarian angles to consider. The goal of this project is to s
Project Information FAQ
Project Information
Want to explore the full details? View the full report
Participants
Sponsoring Agency | Obfuscated Data |
Company | Obfuscated Data |
Status
Original status | forthcoming |
Taiyo status | Obfuscated Data |
Taiyo last update | 00-00-0000 |
Available timestamps | 00-00-0000 |
Available timestamp type | Obfuscated Data |
Contact
Contact name | Obfuscated Data |
Phone | 0000000000 |
ObfuscatedData@email.com | |
Address | Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data |
Description
Description | The world is undergoing a dramatic demographic transition. Fertility rates are falling almost everywhere. In many countries, birth rates are already below replacement. How should policymakers respond, if at all? This question poses a unique challenge because, in addition to standard utilitarian considerations, there are important non-utilitarian angles to consider. The goal of this project is to surface these considerations and clarify their implications for optimal fertility policy. This project will study optimal fertility policy from three non-utilitarian angles. The first is our special obligations towards our contemporaries. Instead of assuming that the goal of policy is to bring about the best outcome from an impartial perspective, I will consider an alternative framework in which policy makers are bound to prioritize the interests of their contemporaries. This means that, even if the planner can bring about a future that is both populous and prosperous, he may choose not to do so if it would be too costly to current people. The second perspective is reproductive autonomy. If we accept the principle that people have the right to make their own fertility choices, then any government interference in this decision is potentially problematic. This has the potential to significantly limit the permissible policy options. The third perspective is the intrinsic value of human achievements. Because raising children is costly, aggressive pronatalist policies may force us to divert resources from other valuable activities, such as the advancement of science or the preservation of our cultural heritage. This project will incorporate these considerations into an otherwise standard quantitative macroeconomic model with endogenous fertility. The outcome of this analysis will be a characterization of the optimal fertility policy, and a deeper understanding of how different normative considerations affect the desirable response to the ongoing demographic transition. |
Original sub-sector | Obfuscated |
Original Currency | USD |
Original budget | 000000000000000 |
Procurement method | Obfuscated Data |
Budget | 000000000000000 |
Location
Region | Obfuscated |
Country | Obfuscated |
State | Obfuscated Data |
County | Obfuscated |
Location | Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data |
Source
Source reliability | High |
Data quality score | 100% |
Source | Obfuscated Data |
URL | obfuscated_data,obfuscateddata.com |
More Details
Project Type | Obfuscated Data |
Article Published Date | Obfuscated Data |
