logo

Rethinking EDI Practice and Policy through Evolutionary Psychology

Sector: Education • Location: United Kingdom

Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal

Project
Ongoing

REDI (Rethinking EDI Practice and Policy through Evolutionary Psychology) aims at revising how International Business (IB) views Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI). EDI has come to be viewed as an essential tool in effective management, and Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) are uniquely placed to rise to the challenge of reducing inequality. Yet to date, interest in EDI within IB has been larg

Project Information FAQ

Project Information

3 Q
The project “Rethinking EDI Practice and Policy through Evolutionary Psychology” is an infrastructure initiative in the Education sector, located in United Kingdom. Taiyo aggregates data on it from EU Funding & Tenders Portal.

Want to explore the full details? View the full report

Participants

Sponsoring Agency

Obfuscated Data

Company

Obfuscated Data

Status

Original status

ongoing

Taiyo status

Obfuscated Data

Taiyo last update

00-00-0000

Available timestamps

00-00-0000

Available timestamp type

Obfuscated Data

Contact

Contact name

Obfuscated Data

Phone

0000000000

Email

ObfuscatedData@email.com

Address

Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data

Description

Description

REDI (Rethinking EDI Practice and Policy through Evolutionary Psychology) aims at revising how International Business (IB) views Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI). EDI has come to be viewed as an essential tool in effective management, and Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) are uniquely placed to rise to the challenge of reducing inequality. Yet to date, interest in EDI within IB has been largely instrumental and mainly limited to pursuing performance gains or reducing losses at a firm level. Essentially, the approach taken to EDI within IB literature employs intricate but ultimately shallow categories of diversity. As a poorly fabricated concept susceptible to almost infinite variations in interpretation, it is hardly remarkable that the literature reports conflicted empirical relationships between diversity and firm outcomes. Consequently, EDI research in IB to date is not able to explain, for example, why resistance occurs within MNEs, nor the potential for management agency. This is a significant omission as top management exerts a pivotal influence on firms’ actions and outcomes especially regarding discretionary social initiatives. Therefore, REDI asks: 1) “How can MNEs create more equal and inclusive EDI practices?” Resolving this question increases conceptual clarity between “equality”, “diversity” and “inclusion”, directs attention towards managerial action, and decreases the need for finding ever more intricate categories of diversity. And 2) “How can policy level changes support more equal and inclusive EDI practices within and beyond the MNE?” Resolving this question increas directs attention to creating a climate where EDI policies can become successful beyond ticking the box. In answering these questions, REDI will draw on evolutionary psychology and the origins of human relations as revealed by archaeological evidence, claiming that the notion of EDI could only emerge because of the existence of artificial boundaries imposed upon human relations.

Original sub-sector

Obfuscated

Original Currency

USD

Original budget

000000000000000

Procurement method

Obfuscated Data

Budget

000000000000000

Location

Region

Obfuscated

Country

Obfuscated

State

Obfuscated Data

County

Obfuscated

Location

Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data

Source

Source reliability

High

Data quality score

100%

Source

Obfuscated Data

URL

obfuscated_data,obfuscateddata.com

More Details

Project Type

Obfuscated Data

Article Published Date

Obfuscated Data