logo

The impact of threats and self-defense on the Sense of Agency

Sector: Aerospace & Defense • Location: Belgium

Source: EU Funding & Tenders Portal

Project
Forthcoming

"Harming another person is considered immoral and punished. However, an exception is made when violence corresponds to a reaction to an external threat, i.e., self-defense. Forgiveness for these violent acts is often explained with legal and moral considerations. However, I suggest that tolerance towards self-defense may also be understood by the considerating the impact of threats on the victim’s

Project Information FAQ

Project Information

4 Q
The project “The impact of threats and self-defense on the Sense of Agency” is an infrastructure initiative in the Aerospace & Defense sector, located in Belgium. Taiyo aggregates data on it from EU Funding & Tenders Portal.

Want to explore the full details? View the full report

Participants

Sponsoring Agency

Obfuscated Data

Company

Obfuscated Data

Status

Original status

forthcoming

Taiyo status

Obfuscated Data

Taiyo last update

00-00-0000

Available timestamps

00-00-0000

Available timestamp type

Obfuscated Data

Contact

Contact name

Obfuscated Data

Phone

0000000000

Email

ObfuscatedData@email.com

Address

Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data

Description

Description

"Harming another person is considered immoral and punished. However, an exception is made when violence corresponds to a reaction to an external threat, i.e., self-defense. Forgiveness for these violent acts is often explained with legal and moral considerations. However, I suggest that tolerance towards self-defense may also be understood by the considerating the impact of threats on the victim’s emotions and Sense of Agency (SoA), i.e., the feeling of controlling one’s actions. The main objective of THREATENED is to examine threat perception and self-defense from the victim’s standpoint. To this aim, I will combine individual (WP1) and multi-agent (WP2) SoA tasks with fear conditioning procedures, which allow to study how individuals learn to fear a threatening stimulus (CS+) compared with one signaling safety (CS-). In WP1.1, I will test if SoA is lower when key presses are performed following a threatening color cue (CS+) paired with a mildly painful electrical shock, compared to a cue signaling safety (CS-). In WP1.2, I will study if freedom of choice increases SoA and reduces fear of CS+. In WP2.1, I will assess the impact of interpersonal threats, by comparing SoA in a threatening – the ""victim"" receives a shock by a co-participant (CS+) – vs. a safe social context (CS-). In WP2.2, I will test if self-defense can counter the detrimental effects of interpersonal threats on SoA, by letting the ""victim"" choose whether to avoid the electrical stimulation (flight) or to react by sending a shock to the ""aggressor"" (fight). In all studies, I will gauge physiological responses to threat (Skin Conductance Response), and I will employ electroencephalography (EEG) to measure how the victim’s brain processes the consequences of their actions. THREATENED will produce valuable information to devise i) novel ways to interpret the feelings of control of a victim, which could prove useful for legal authorities and ii) new therapeutic approaches for the victims of violence."

Original sub-sector

Obfuscated

Original Currency

USD

Original budget

000000000000000

Procurement method

Obfuscated Data

Budget

000000000000000

Location

Region

Obfuscated

Country

Obfuscated

State

Obfuscated Data

County

Obfuscated

Location

Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data

Source

Source reliability

High

Data quality score

100%

Source

Obfuscated Data

URL

obfuscated_data,obfuscateddata.com

More Details

Project Type

Obfuscated Data

Article Published Date

Obfuscated Data