University of Queensland Platform for Solar Farm Pre-Commissioning
Source: Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)
The University of Queensland will develop a testing platform to improve the commissioning process for large-scale inverter-based generators such as wind, solar and batteries. Large-scale generators are required to negotiate and agree to a set of Generator Performance Standards (GPS) which are set out in their connection agreements. The ability of a project to meet its GPS is initially demonstrated
Project Information FAQ
Project Information
Want to explore the full details? View the full report
Participants
Sponsoring Agency | Obfuscated Data |
Company | Obfuscated Data |
Status
Original status | closed |
Taiyo status | Obfuscated Data |
Taiyo last update | 00-00-0000 |
Available timestamps | 00-00-0000 |
Available timestamp type | Obfuscated Data |
Contact
Contact name | Obfuscated Data |
Phone | 0000000000 |
ObfuscatedData@email.com | |
Address | Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data |
Description
Description | The University of Queensland will develop a testing platform to improve the commissioning process for large-scale inverter-based generators such as wind, solar and batteries. Large-scale generators are required to negotiate and agree to a set of Generator Performance Standards (GPS) which are set out in their connection agreements. The ability of a project to meet its GPS is initially demonstrated by extensive power system modelling. This modelling is submitted to the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), who checks compliance with the GPS and network stability criteria. This is known as R1 Testing.Later, the system models approved in the R1 testing must be validated during on-site commissioning (known as R2 Testing). This validation is very challenging and often results in long delays.The generator is given an indicative period of 3 months to achieve a staged solar farm connection (e.g. 0%, 10%, 50% and 100% – known as Hold Points), and each stage requires resolution of the differences between the R1 Testing software model and the R2 performance. AEMO requires that the simulation model responses must match the observed electrical behaviours within ±10% before granting its final connection approval.Typically, many iterations of review, submission and testing are required between R1 and R2 testing. This can lead to significant delays and significant costs as projects remain stuck at lower Hold Points with very restricted generation limits, affecting subsequent revenue. The project will see the University of Queensland develop a hardware-in-the-loop platform for pre-commissioning of the Aggregated Generator Control System (AGCS). The project is made up of 3 phases:Establishing the hardware platform: creating models of a solar farm and the power system, which will interface with the Power Quality Meters to take real-time measurements, which are then passed through to the Power Plant Controller, which will generate a control command for the solar farm.Standardised testing procedure: creating a standardised testing procedure for AGCS performance. The test result should determine the required changes to the AGCS model to make it more precisely simulate actual performance.Demonstration on real test case: The Testing Platform will be trialled via a real-life project application. This demonstration will be used to refine and verify the Testing Platform. This project aims to:Commission inverter-based generators (e.g. solar, wind, battery, hybrids) faster by allowing them to resolve any misalignment between their AGCS and the R1 models prior to commissioning.Reduce barriers and lower the cost of renewable energy projects through faster and lower risk commissioning.Prepare for commercialisation of the Testing Platform for use on future renewable energy projects. |
Original sub-sector | Obfuscated |
Original Currency | USD |
Original budget | 000000000000000 |
Procurement method | Obfuscated Data |
Budget | 000000000000000 |
Location
Region | Obfuscated |
Country | Obfuscated |
State | Obfuscated Data |
County | Obfuscated |
Location | Obfuscated Data, Obfuscated data, obfuscated data, Obfuscated data |
Source
Source reliability | High |
Data quality score | 100% |
Source | Obfuscated Data |
URL | obfuscated_data,obfuscateddata.com |
More Details
Project Type | Obfuscated Data |
Article Published Date | Obfuscated Data |
