Audit Qualification Literature Review
Active · United Kingdom
Source: Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS)
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) regulates auditors, accountants and actuaries and sets the UK's Corporate Governance and Stewardship Codes. As the Competent Authority for audit in the UK, we set auditing and ethical standards and monitor and enforce audit quality. The purpose of the FRC is to serve the public interest and support UK economic growth by upholding high standards of corporate go
- Status
- Bidding
- Sector
- Education, Government
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Updated
- 3 Nov 2026
- Source
- Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS)
ConstructChat
Ask ConstructChat about Audit Qualification Literature Review
Pick a question to edit it, or write your own.
First answer free · no account
Tender Information FAQ
Tender Information
Participants
| Not available for this record. |
Status
Original status | active |
Taiyo status | Bidding |
Taiyo last update | 2026-11-03 |
Contact
| Not available for this record. |
Description
Description | The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) regulates auditors, accountants and actuaries and sets the UK's Corporate Governance and Stewardship Codes. As the Competent Authority for audit in the UK, we set auditing and ethical standards and monitor and enforce audit quality. The purpose of the FRC is to serve the public interest and support UK economic growth by upholding high standards of corporate governance, corporate reporting, audit and actuarial work. Our requirement is for an Audit Qualification Literature Review. Purpose This project will gather, synthesise and analyse existing evidence, including academic research, on the pre-qualification education, training, and assessment of UK statutory auditors. Specifically it will: • Summarise current thinking on changes in the role of financial auditors, specifically with respect to their education and training needs. • Examine the evidence on how technology and AI are influencing auditor knowledge and skill requirements - and how this might feed through to qualification requirements. • Identify challenges these changes pose for the pre-qualification education and training of auditors and the assessment mechanisms used to admit them to the profession. • Identify specific topics / proxies / sources which will help us monitor the audit qualification landscape and the impact of any changes. • Explore how other jurisdictions and professions (e.g. the legal profession) are responding or changing their own qualification pathways. • Present a consolidated view of academic, professional, and industry insights. Scope The review should cover the UK plus comparable jurisdictions (for example EEA countries, US, Australia, Canada, Singapore). Sources: • Academic literature (peer-reviewed journals, conference papers). • Professional bodies (e.g. ICAEW, ACCA, IAASB, PCAOB, IIA). • Corporate and consultancy reports. • Regulatory documents and policy papers. • Comparative insights from law and other regulated professions. Suggested approach Literature Search • Databases: Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, SSRN. • Professional sources (e.g.) ICAEW, ACCA, IFAC, IAASB, PCAOB, etc. • Grey literature: company/consultancy analyses; government / regulator briefings; think tank publications. Inclusion Criteria • Recently published (to capture post-pandemic and tech-driven changes). • Focus on pre-qualification audit education, training, technology, and professional qualification reform. • Comparative studies or case examples from other professions. Thematic synthesis across four dimensions 1. Role evolution and skill gaps. 2. Professional training and educational responses in other jurisdictions. 3. Technology-driven competency requirements. 4. Cross-professional lessons. Workshop Part way through the research, a review workshop will be held at the FRC offices (either London or Birmingham) to discuss a full draft of the Review. This will involve the authors of the Review (i.e. the appointed contract team) and independent expert discussants as well as the FRC's internal policy team. The Review authors will subsequently revise/extend the draft Review to incorporate insights, and address comments, arising from the workshop. PLEASE REFER TO THE INVITATION TO TENDER FOR FULL DETAILS. IMPORTANT • Please register your interest by emailing the FRC's procurement team - procurement@frc.org.uk • The FRC will share all tender queries and answers with those that have registered. • Your tender submission must be submitted within the deadline by email to procurement@frc.org.uk |
Location
Country | United Kingdom (UK) |
Source
Source | Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) |
URL |
More Details
Record type | Tender |
Sector | Education, Government |
Article published date | 2026-04-02 |
Research
Free account
View all details
You are reading the public part. A free account opens the rest:
- Every detail on this tender
- News and media coverage
- Technical research
Free account · no card · lands you back on this tender
More Education tenders in United Kingdom
- SUMIT Project Hardware and Connectivity Services
- Laboratory Consumables and Chemicals
- LAB1040 AP - Mass Spectrometry & Chromatography Equipment (APUC)
- SUMIT Project - Provision of Digital Products
- SUMIT Project - Provision of Digital Products
- QSB442 0900 2026-05-19 Lavenham – Sudbury library, Sudbury (4-seated vehicle required)
- Client Transport Services 2026 - 2034 - SEND
- Lexis Plus Academic Library
