logo

FY 2026 Rural Road and University Drive Grade Separation Feasibility Study

The scope, dates and status of this tender. A free account opens every field.

Source: Arizona Purchasing Group

Tender
Closed

Task 1 : Project Management Plan and Administration The CONSULTANT shall provide overall project management and administrative support necessary to deliver the study in accordance with the approved project scope , budget , and schedule . This task establishes management structure , coordination processes , and quality cont

Status
Closed
Sector
Road, Mass Transit, Rail, Education, Commercial
Location
Arizona, United States of America
Updated
3 Nov 2026
Source
Arizona Purchasing Group

ConstructChat

Ask ConstructChat about FY 2026 Rural Road and University Drive Grade Separation Feasibility Study

Pick a question to edit it, or write your own.

First answer free · no account

I am a

Tender Information FAQ

Tender Information

3 Q
The tender “FY 2026 Rural Road and University Drive Grade Separation Feasibility Study” is a tender record in Taiyo, linked to the Road sector. It is issued for works, goods, or services related to Arizona, United States of America.

Participants

Not available for this record.

Status

Original status

closed

Taiyo status

Closed

Taiyo last update

2026-11-03

Contact

Not available for this record.

Description

Description

Task 1 : Project Management Plan and Administration The CONSULTANT shall provide overall project management and administrative support necessary to deliver the study in accordance with the approved project scope , budget , and schedule . This task establishes management structure , coordination processes , and quality controls required to support timely delivery of technical work products and informed decision - making . The CONSULTANT shall develop and implement a Project Management Plan (“ PMP ”) that defines project organization , roles and responsibilities , communication protocols , coordination procedures , and quality assurance / quality control ( QA / QC ) practices . The PMP shall serve as the governing document for the Study ’ s execution . The CONSULTANT shall coordinate closely with MAG ’ s staff and designated project partners throughout the Study . Project coordination shall include regular meetings ( including field meetings and site visits , if necessary ) to review progress , discuss technical issues , confirm assumptions , and obtain input at key decision points . The CONSULTANT shall document decisions , action items , and follow - up responsibilities from all meetings . At a minimum , the CONSULTANT shall conduct the following coordination items : 1 . PROJECT COORDINATION AND MEETINGS : The consultant shall support the following coordination structure : • Project Management Team (“ PMT ”): The PMT shall include MAG ’ s staff and the CONSULTANT project manager and key staff . PMT meetings shall be held on a regular basis to monitor progress , review work products , address technical and administrative issues , and confirm schedule and budget status . • Management Partners (“ MP ”): Management Partners shall include representatives from Valley Metro and the City of Tempe . Coordination meetings with the MP shall occur at regular intervals and at key Study milestones to review technical findings , provide input on study direction , and support consensus - building on major Study decisions and recommendations . Meetings with the MP may either be focused on individual meetings with each agency or combined meetings with multiple agencies . • Agency Stakeholders : Targeted coordination with other agencies , including Arizona State University and the ADOT Rail Safety Section , shall be conducted as needed to inform study assumptions , review findings , and identify issues relevant to feasibility , operations , and implementation . The CONSULTANT shall prepare meeting agendas in advance of each meeting and provide written summaries documenting discussion topics , decisions , action items , and next steps . Materials will be provided to the PM no later than three ( 3 ) business days before and after the scheduled meeting . 2 . PROJECT SCHEDULE AND PROGRESS TRACKING : The CONSULTANT shall prepare a detailed project schedule identifying the duration and completion for all tasks , subtasks , milestones , draft and final deliverables , and presentations , and anticipated review periods . Review periods for deliverables that require PM review should be five ( 5 ) or more business days , and ten ( 10 ) or more business days for deliverables that require additional MP or MAG leadership review . The schedule shall be used to track progress against the approved baseline and shall be updated regularly to reflect actual progress and any approved changes . The CONSULTANT shall monitor project performance and proactively identify potential schedule or budget issues . Any anticipated deviations from the approved scope , schedule , or budget shall be communicated to MAG in a timely manner . 3 . QUALITY CONTROL PLAN : The CONSULTANT shall create a QA / QC plan for all technical and administrative deliverables . QA / QC procedures shall include internal review processes and documentation of review comments and resolutions prior to submission to MAG . The Consultant shall indicate a comment resolution process . This will be used as needed to review deliverables and may be held in conjunction with the scheduled Project Team meetings .

Location

Country

United States of America (USA)

State

Arizona

Source

Source

Arizona Purchasing Group

URL

More Details

Record type

Tender

Sector

Road, Mass Transit, Rail, Education, Commercial

Article published date

2026-03-27

More on this tender

Research

Free account

View all details

You are reading the public part. A free account opens the rest:

  • Every detail on this tender
  • News and media coverage
  • Technical research
View all details

Free account · no card · lands you back on this tender